ENSWhois
Hidden analysis

Holder behaviour by tier

Do wallets behave differently depending on how many .eth names they hold?

Snapshot taken 2026-05-01T13:51:22.632Z

Wallet-weighted remaining expiry by tier

Highlights the mean and median months-to-expiry for buckets of wallets based on the number of ENS names that they own.

Tier Wallets Names held Mean (months) Median (months)
1 name 350,439 350,439 40.4 14.8
2–5 names 65,482 173,234 49.2 28.6
6–10 names 8,642 64,302 40.0 23.7
11–50 names 6,822 141,024 31.0 17.1
51–100 names 836 58,070 22.6 13.0
100+ names 621 160,951 22.4 12.1

Retention by holder tier (incl Dropped)

For each tier (where tier = current names-held tier of the original registrant), how many names that wallet ever first-registered are still active today? The Dropped row tells you what fraction of names registered by exited wallets persisted in any form.

Tier Names ever registered Still alive (any holder) % still alive % still held by original
Dropped (0 current) 1,690,618 155,026 9.2% 0.0%
1 name 574,554 306,311 53.3% 46.4%
2–5 names 423,803 167,818 39.6% 29.7%
6–10 names 157,861 60,089 38.1% 27.9%
11–50 names 291,088 111,974 38.5% 29.5%
51–100 names 84,702 38,143 45.0% 36.6%
100+ names 158,043 85,925 54.4% 47.8%

"Still held by original" is the stricter signal - the registrant didn't just see their name get re-registered by someone else, they actually still hold it. Big gap between "still alive" and "still held by original" means lots of secondary-market churn.

Registration duration choice by tier

When wallets in each tier register a name, what duration do they pick? % of each tier's registrations.

Dropped (0 current)
19%
54%
23%
1,778,685
1 name
9%
35%
25%
16%
15%
623,090
2–5 names
13%
36%
23%
14%
13%
470,272
6–10 names
11%
38%
27%
14%
11%
175,503
11–50 names
16%
40%
24%
12%
347,525
51–100 names
18%
35%
26%
12%
109,294
100+ names
13%
43%
25%
12%
218,349
<1y1y1-3y3-5y5y+

Renewal duration choice by tier

When wallets in each tier renew, what duration do they pick? Renewer = the address that signed the renewal transaction; their tier is their current names-held bucket.

Dropped (0 current)
81%
12%
747
1 name
64%
18%
10%
791
2–5 names
41%
34%
12%
9%
428
6–10 names
57%
38%
537
11–50 names
55%
20%
22%
2,319
51–100 names
85%
3,617
100+ names
53%
14%
33%
3,645
<1y1y1-3y3-5y5y+
Methodology