ENSWhois

Holder behaviour by tier

Do wallets behave differently depending on how many .eth names they hold?

Snapshot taken 2026-11-01T03:35:59.367Z

Wallet-weighted remaining expiry by tier

Highlights the mean and median months-to-expiry for buckets of wallets based on the number of ENS names that they own.

Tier Wallets Names held Mean (months) Median (months)
1 name 294,588 294,588 43.3 17.4
2–5 names 57,879 152,584 50.4 31.1
6–10 names 7,250 53,811 41.4 25.2
11–50 names 5,565 113,673 32.8 18.2
51–100 names 655 45,673 24.7 14.4
100+ names 472 119,309 24.6 12.0

Retention by holder tier (incl Dropped)

For each tier (where tier = current names-held tier of the original registrant), how many names that wallet ever first-registered are still active today? The Dropped row tells you what fraction of names registered by exited wallets persisted in any form.

Tier Names ever registered Still alive (any holder) % still alive % still held by original
Dropped (0 current) 1,861,232 136,636 7.3% 0.0%
1 name 537,971 252,795 47.0% 41.1%
2–5 names 411,516 144,458 35.1% 26.7%
6–10 names 137,706 48,383 35.1% 26.4%
11–50 names 255,799 87,494 34.2% 26.6%
51–100 names 76,580 28,653 37.4% 31.0%
100+ names 113,613 61,091 53.8% 48.2%

"Still held by original" is the stricter signal - the registrant didn't just see their name get re-registered by someone else, they actually still hold it. Big gap between "still alive" and "still held by original" means lots of secondary-market churn.

Registration duration choice by tier

When wallets in each tier register a name, what duration do they pick? % of each tier's registrations.

Dropped (0 current)
18%
57%
21%
1,976,834
1 name
10%
37%
22%
17%
14%
587,990
2–5 names
14%
40%
21%
14%
12%
460,935
6–10 names
13%
42%
21%
14%
10%
159,479
11–50 names
19%
41%
21%
13%
318,803
51–100 names
15%
42%
24%
12%
97,333
100+ names
11%
49%
20%
13%
8%
157,683
<1y1y1-3y3-5y5y+

Renewal duration choice by tier

When wallets in each tier renew, what duration do they pick? Renewer = the address that signed the renewal transaction; their tier is their current names-held bucket.

Dropped (0 current)
69%
21%
13,294
1 name
61%
21%
10%
9,880
2–5 names
60%
29%
12,575
6–10 names
80%
14%
12,398
11–50 names
87%
10%
67,877
51–100 names
69%
22%
9%
15,780
100+ names
45%
47%
8%
26,463
<1y1y1-3y3-5y5y+
Methodology