ENSWhois

Holder behaviour by tier

Do wallets behave differently depending on how many .eth names they hold?

Snapshot taken 2026-09-20T03:25:57.667Z

Wallet-weighted remaining expiry by tier

Highlights the mean and median months-to-expiry for buckets of wallets based on the number of ENS names that they own.

Tier Wallets Names held Mean (months) Median (months)
1 name 305,166 305,166 42.7 16.4
2–5 names 59,508 157,022 50.0 30.6
6–10 names 7,510 55,782 41.3 24.7
11–50 names 5,814 118,821 32.6 18.0
51–100 names 711 49,494 24.0 13.3
100+ names 483 122,680 24.5 11.8

Retention by holder tier (incl Dropped)

For each tier (where tier = current names-held tier of the original registrant), how many names that wallet ever first-registered are still active today? The Dropped row tells you what fraction of names registered by exited wallets persisted in any form.

Tier Names ever registered Still alive (any holder) % still alive % still held by original
Dropped (0 current) 1,825,847 138,600 7.6% 0.0%
1 name 544,508 263,434 48.4% 42.2%
2–5 names 413,604 148,682 35.9% 27.4%
6–10 names 141,441 50,456 35.7% 26.8%
11–50 names 262,833 92,180 35.1% 27.4%
51–100 names 88,640 31,429 35.5% 29.2%
100+ names 114,453 63,563 55.5% 49.7%

"Still held by original" is the stricter signal - the registrant didn't just see their name get re-registered by someone else, they actually still hold it. Big gap between "still alive" and "still held by original" means lots of secondary-market churn.

Registration duration choice by tier

When wallets in each tier register a name, what duration do they pick? % of each tier's registrations.

Dropped (0 current)
18%
57%
20%
1,932,202
1 name
9%
38%
22%
18%
14%
593,439
2–5 names
14%
39%
21%
14%
11%
466,114
6–10 names
10%
44%
22%
14%
10%
161,653
11–50 names
18%
41%
21%
13%
322,904
51–100 names
18%
40%
24%
11%
114,551
100+ names
11%
49%
19%
13%
8%
160,866
<1y1y1-3y3-5y5y+

Renewal duration choice by tier

When wallets in each tier renew, what duration do they pick? Renewer = the address that signed the renewal transaction; their tier is their current names-held bucket.

Dropped (0 current)
46%
39%
10%
5,277
1 name
52%
27%
12%
6,475
2–5 names
71%
20%
12,446
6–10 names
59%
31%
5,806
11–50 names
85%
12%
51,727
51–100 names
76%
17%
19,817
100+ names
47%
43%
10%
19,742
<1y1y1-3y3-5y5y+
Methodology