Do wallets behave differently depending on how many .eth names they hold?
Snapshot taken 2026-11-01T03:35:59.367Z
Highlights the mean and median months-to-expiry for buckets of wallets based on the number of ENS names that they own.
| Tier | Wallets | Names held | Mean (months) | Median (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 name | 294,588 | 294,588 | 43.3 | 17.4 |
| 2–5 names | 57,879 | 152,584 | 50.4 | 31.1 |
| 6–10 names | 7,250 | 53,811 | 41.4 | 25.2 |
| 11–50 names | 5,565 | 113,673 | 32.8 | 18.2 |
| 51–100 names | 655 | 45,673 | 24.7 | 14.4 |
| 100+ names | 472 | 119,309 | 24.6 | 12.0 |
For each tier (where tier = current names-held tier of the original registrant), how many names that wallet ever first-registered are still active today? The Dropped row tells you what fraction of names registered by exited wallets persisted in any form.
| Tier | Names ever registered | Still alive (any holder) | % still alive | % still held by original | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dropped (0 current) | 1,861,232 | 136,636 | 7.3% | 0.0% | |
| 1 name | 537,971 | 252,795 | 47.0% | 41.1% | |
| 2–5 names | 411,516 | 144,458 | 35.1% | 26.7% | |
| 6–10 names | 137,706 | 48,383 | 35.1% | 26.4% | |
| 11–50 names | 255,799 | 87,494 | 34.2% | 26.6% | |
| 51–100 names | 76,580 | 28,653 | 37.4% | 31.0% | |
| 100+ names | 113,613 | 61,091 | 53.8% | 48.2% |
"Still held by original" is the stricter signal - the registrant didn't just see their name get re-registered by someone else, they actually still hold it. Big gap between "still alive" and "still held by original" means lots of secondary-market churn.
When wallets in each tier register a name, what duration do they pick? % of each tier's registrations.
When wallets in each tier renew, what duration do they pick? Renewer = the address that signed the renewal transaction; their tier is their current names-held bucket.