Primary-name adoption by length

Of currently-active .eth SLDs in each length bucket, what fraction are actually used rather than just held?

Counts names where the owner has set a primary name (reverse record) on any namespace pointing back to that domain.

What this tells you:

High adoption implies real users who care about display identity.
Low adoption implies names held without active use in mind e.g. speculative inventory.
For the pricing debate: if 3-character survivors have notably higher primary-name adoption than long-name survivors, the price filtered for utility users.

Length	Active	With primary	Adoption
3 chars	3,451	850	24.63%
4 chars	11,866	2,891	24.36%
5 chars	119,834	40,523	33.82%
6–9 chars	459,100	163,392	35.59%
10+ chars	356,093	106,310	29.85%

Methodology

Active .eth SLDs only (depth=2, parent='eth', expiry_timestamp >= now).
Adoption = owner has a primary name on ANY reverse namespace (addr.reverse, default.reverse, or any ENSIP-19 chain-specific registrar) that resolves exactly to this domain's full_name.
Doesn't require forward-resolution match against the addr record - that would be a stricter definition; here we just check the reverse side.